RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Bartonella spp., renowned for cat-scratch disease, has limited reports of dissemination. Tissue and blood cultures have limitations in detecting this fastidious pathogen. Molecular testing (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) and cell-free DNA have provided an avenue for diagnoses. This retrospective observational multicenter study describes the incidence of disseminated Bartonella spp. and treatment-related outcomes. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of bartonellosis via diagnosis code, serology testing of blood, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of blood, 16/18S tests of blood or tissue, cultures of blood or tissue, or cell-free DNA of blood or tissue from January 1, 2014, through September 1, 2021. Exclusions were patients who did not receive treatment, insufficient data on treatment course, absence of dissemination, or retinitis as dissemination. RESULTS: Patients were primarily male (n = 25, 61.0%), white (n = 28, 68.3%), with mean age of 50 years (SD 14.4), and mean Charlson comorbidity index of 3.5 (SD 2.1). Diagnosis was primarily by serology (n = 34, 82.9%), with Bartonella henselae (n = 40, 97.6%) as the causative pathogen. Treatment was principally doxycycline with rifampin (n = 17, 41.5%). Treatment failure occurred in 16 (39.0%) patients, due to escalation of therapy during treatment (n = 5, 31.3%) or discontinuation of therapy due to an adverse event or tolerability (n = 5, 31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this is the largest United States-based cohort of disseminated Bartonella spp. infections to date with a reported 39% treatment failure. This adds to literature supporting obtaining multiple diagnostic tests when Bartonella is suspected and describes treatment options.
RESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the effects early de-escalation of antipseudomonal ß-lactam (APBL) on 90-day CDI risk in Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (BSIs). Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: An academic medical center in South Carolina. Patients: We included patients aged >18 years with monomicrobial BSIs with Enterobacterales who received APBL between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. Methods: Rates of CDI were compared between patients who received an APBL for >72 hours and <72 hours, followed by comparison between formulary APBLs utilized. Results: In total, 447 patients were included; 292 and 155 patients received APBL for < 72 hours and > 72 hours, respectively. The incidences of CDI for <72 hours compared to >72 hours were 2.4% and 6.5%, respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-7.10; P = .04). This difference was not statistically significant in the adjusted model (HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 0.97-7.31; P = .06). Meropenem was associated with an increased risk of CDI when compared with all other formulary APBLs: 4 (26.7%) of 15 versus 13 (3.0%) of 432 (P < .001). Conclusions: Utilization of an APBL for >72 hours was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of CDI in an unadjusted model and with a numerically higher CDI incidence in the adjusted model. Meropenem was the formulary APBL that carried the highest risk of CDI. The results of this study provide further evidence supporting active antimicrobial stewardship to reduce unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics in the effort to alleviate the burden that CDI imposes on the healthcare system.
